Deprecated: The behavior of unparenthesized expressions containing both '.' and '+'/'-' will change in PHP 8: '+'/'-' will take a higher precedence in /customers/b/f/8/logg.org/httpd.www/anders/wp-content/plugins/ninja-tables/admin/NinjaTablesAdmin.php on line 370 Deprecated: The behavior of unparenthesized expressions containing both '.' and '+'/'-' will change in PHP 8: '+'/'-' will take a higher precedence in /customers/b/f/8/logg.org/httpd.www/anders/wp-content/plugins/ninja-tables/admin/NinjaTablesAdmin.php on line 432 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /customers/b/f/8/logg.org/httpd.www/anders/wp-content/plugins/ninja-tables/admin/NinjaTablesAdmin.php:370) in /customers/b/f/8/logg.org/httpd.www/anders/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8 Comments for Anders Logg https://anders.logg.org Professor of Computational Mathematics at Chalmers University of Technology Wed, 05 Oct 2016 15:18:40 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.3.4 Comment on Systems of chemical reactions in FEniCS by Hossein https://anders.logg.org/2016/05/11/systems-of-chemical-reactions-in-fenics/#comment-159 Wed, 05 Oct 2016 15:18:40 +0000 http://www.logg.org/anders/?p=155#comment-159 Thanks.

It works!

]]>
Comment on Systems of chemical reactions in FEniCS by logg https://anders.logg.org/2016/05/11/systems-of-chemical-reactions-in-fenics/#comment-158 Wed, 05 Oct 2016 11:14:25 +0000 http://www.logg.org/anders/?p=155#comment-158 You should get version 2016.1, not 1.6.0.

]]>
Comment on Systems of chemical reactions in FEniCS by Hossein https://anders.logg.org/2016/05/11/systems-of-chemical-reactions-in-fenics/#comment-157 Wed, 05 Oct 2016 11:11:27 +0000 http://www.logg.org/anders/?p=155#comment-157 I also tried

element = (P1 * P1) * P1

element = P1 * P1* P1

element = VectorElement(’P’, ’triangle’, 1, dim=3)

but again, I get the same error !

]]>
Comment on Systems of chemical reactions in FEniCS by Hossein https://anders.logg.org/2016/05/11/systems-of-chemical-reactions-in-fenics/#comment-156 Wed, 05 Oct 2016 09:22:27 +0000 http://www.logg.org/anders/?p=155#comment-156 Also version of FEniCS is now 1.6.0

]]>
Comment on Systems of chemical reactions in FEniCS by Hossein https://anders.logg.org/2016/05/11/systems-of-chemical-reactions-in-fenics/#comment-155 Wed, 05 Oct 2016 09:18:45 +0000 http://www.logg.org/anders/?p=155#comment-155 Thanks.

I updated the FEniCS but, again it did not work. I’m using ubuntu 14.04 and version of python is 2.7.6. Are these OK ?

Thank you for your time.
Best,
Hossein

]]>
Comment on Systems of chemical reactions in FEniCS by logg https://anders.logg.org/2016/05/11/systems-of-chemical-reactions-in-fenics/#comment-153 Tue, 04 Oct 2016 18:50:27 +0000 http://www.logg.org/anders/?p=155#comment-153 You must be running an old version of FEniCS. Get the latest = v2016.1!

]]>
Comment on Systems of chemical reactions in FEniCS by Hossein https://anders.logg.org/2016/05/11/systems-of-chemical-reactions-in-fenics/#comment-152 Tue, 04 Oct 2016 15:28:58 +0000 http://www.logg.org/anders/?p=155#comment-152 Dear Anders,

When I run the above code I get the following error:

V = FunctionSpace(mesh, element)
TypeError: __init__() takes at least 4 arguments (3 given)

could you please help with this?

Best,
Hossein

]]>
Comment on New FEniCS Tutorial coming soon by logg https://anders.logg.org/2016/04/26/new-fenics-tutorial-coming-soon/#comment-115 Mon, 22 Aug 2016 08:26:58 +0000 http://www.logg.org/anders/?p=141#comment-115 Yes, we’re currently proofreading it. It should be ready within 1-2 weeks.

]]>
Comment on New FEniCS Tutorial coming soon by Jonas https://anders.logg.org/2016/04/26/new-fenics-tutorial-coming-soon/#comment-112 Fri, 19 Aug 2016 16:47:25 +0000 http://www.logg.org/anders/?p=141#comment-112 Hi Dr. Logg, I was wondering if there was an update on the release of the new tutorial. Thanks, Jonas

]]>
Comment on Mesh generation in FEniCS by logg https://anders.logg.org/2016/06/02/mesh-generation-in-fenics/#comment-41 Wed, 08 Jun 2016 09:47:09 +0000 http://www.logg.org/anders/?p=182#comment-41 There’s no problem doing rectangular holes but I don’t think it’s possible (either because it’s not available in the meshing backends or we don’t have an interface for it) to guarantee that the mesh is structured.

]]>